評論

Next step: Smashing of Chrysolina along the clades defined on patterns of potentially degraded DNA ("Museomics")?
https://medwinpublishers.com/IZAB/the-genetic-and-cytogenetic-relationships-among-subgenera-of-chrysolina-motschulsky-1860-and-oreina-chevrolat-1837-coleoptera-chrysomelidae-chrysomelinae.pdf

I do not really object the present change, only because the taxon had been "Dlochrysa" for a long time.
Please let matters be discussed first in similar cases, Rob.

發佈由 borisb 5 個月 前

Yes, this taxon goes back and forth in and out of Chrysolina it seems. It looks like this is final proof it is not in Chrysolina.

發佈由 rob-westerduijn 5 個月 前

新增評論

登入註冊 添加評論