注意：此分割影響到部分或全部的鑑定，也許會被替換成 Demansia 的鑑定。 當我們無法自動指派一筆鑑定到輸出分類群之中時會發生這樣的情況。 檢閱Demansia reticulata539606的鑑定
更新您的內容

Taxonomic Split 127673 (提交於 2024-04-16)

Nankivell et al. 2023 found some populations referred to D. r. cupreiceps Storr are not distinguishable from more typical D. reticulata but the widespread central Australian population (treated by most authors as part of cupreiceps) was shown to be specifically distinct. They describe the species, naming it D. cyanochasma.

未知
由 rfoster 於 2023年06月30日 04:51 所新增 | 由 loarie 於 2024年04月16日 所提交
分拆至

評論

DOI: https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5311.3.1

發佈由 rfoster 10 個月 前

Demansia reticulata cupreiceps still a valid ssp according to Reptile Database, can you contact them? They did just add Demansia cyanochasma though

發佈由 loarie 7 個月 前

I've spoken to Peter (@uetz) and he will amend the Demansia reticulata entry in the Reptile Database.

發佈由 rfoster 7 個月 前

@uetz Peter, is there any progress on amending the Demansia reticulata entry in The Reptile Database to sink the subspecies, in line with Nankivell et al., 2023?

發佈由 rfoster 6 個月 前

@loarie I have altered this from a split of Demansia reticulata cupreiceps to a split of Demansia reticulata in order to carve off the D. cyanochasma observations without having to deal with the subspecies glitch in TRD. This is now ready to go - most D. cyanochasma observations have been reidentified manually, anyway, but committing the split will tie up a few loose ends.

發佈由 rfoster 6 個月 前

新增評論

登入 或 註冊 添加評論
iNaturalist 網路的成員   |   技術由 iNaturalist 開放原始碼軟體提供 |   開發者文件