注意:此分割影響到部分或全部的鑑定,也許會被替換成 Selaginella 的鑑定。 當我們無法自動指派一筆鑑定到輸出分類群之中時會發生這樣的情況。 檢閱Selaginella densa136990的鑑定

評論

Hi to all, just to be really clear, please could no one commit this until I have finished reviewing all the S. densa s.l. observations, I am trying to apply a var. to as many as possible to help with this complicated swap/split. The majority of S. densa s.l. observations are correct and will not have unintended disagreements if I merely add in the var. densa ID. This review will take me some days; I hope to be done by early May. Thank you!

發佈由 margaret_eaglecap 3 個月 前

@birdwhisperer @wildskyflower All ready for the split, thank you so much for all your help!

發佈由 margaret_eaglecap 2 個月 前

Can do let me double check the atlases first though

發佈由 wildskyflower 2 個月 前

@margaret_eaglecap I tweaked the atlases a little bit down to county level based on the observation you've ID'd plus the FNA maps. I tried to be conservative and make things overlap if there looked like any chance that they might. The tweaks prevent about 80 IDs from being changed that otherwise would have been. Can you double check the new atlases and see if they look good to you or if you have any further suggested changes?

發佈由 wildskyflower 2 個月 前

@wildskyflower Ok thanks for that...I'm sorry I don't understand all the mechanics of the atlasing, but I do notice a few observations of S. scopulorum that are in States that are atlased as containing RG observations, but the counties are blank - not assigned either to no-RG or RG... is that ok? I don't see that on the S. densa or S. scopulorum maps, although I could have missed some by just panning and zooming.
So you mean that now 80 S. densa s.l. IDs will just stay as S. densa and not drop to genus?
And the S. densa s.l. in SK, MB, ON, ND, & SD are going to stay as S. densa s.s., whether they are IDd as S. densa s.l. or S. densa var. densa? Just checking, since most of them don't have a var. densa ID.
Thank you!

發佈由 margaret_eaglecap 2 個月 前

@margaret_eaglecap There are only 4 observations currently ID'd as selaginella densa that aren't covered by one or more of the atlases; 2 private location (which can't be helped), 1 in Bolivia that already has a disagreeing ID, and this casual one: https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/200633281. I don't think I see any s. scopularum observations outside the atlas, but if you point me to the ones you are concerned about I can check.

發佈由 wildskyflower 2 個月 前

@wildskyflower Here are the S. scopulorum observations that are in a State atlas but not in a County atlas, which may be totally OK...?
https://inaturalist.ca/observations/172172421
https://inaturalist.ca/observations/178305677
https://inaturalist.ca/observations/31731032
https://inaturalist.ca/observations/31739526
https://inaturalist.ca/observations/124923623
https://inaturalist.ca/observations/83555370
https://inaturalist.ca/observations/36458475

How do I see the two private location observations? Can you share those links?

Thank you!

發佈由 margaret_eaglecap 2 個月 前

@margaret_eaglecap Those won't change they're already ID'd to s. scopularum. Here are the private ones:

https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/164961666 https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/109672435

發佈由 wildskyflower 2 個月 前

@wildskyflower Ok, those are var. densa, I fixed them.
Ready to commit the split now I think?

發佈由 margaret_eaglecap 約 2 個月 前

Committed. May take some time to update all of the records

發佈由 wildskyflower 約 2 個月 前

@wildskyflower Thank you so much for all your help!

發佈由 margaret_eaglecap 約 2 個月 前

新增評論

登入註冊 添加評論