注意:此分割影響到部分或全部的鑑定,也許會被替換成 Circus 的鑑定。 當我們無法自動指派一筆鑑定到輸出分類群之中時會發生這樣的情況。 檢閱Circus cyaneus5170的鑑定

Taxonomic Split 24857 (提交於 2017-08-30)

The eBird/Clements checklist of birds... (引用)
maxkirsch 於 2017年08月30日 14:40 所新增 | 由 maxkirsch 於 2017年08月30日 所提交
分拆至

評論

@maxkirsch thanks for making this change
last night, I committed http://www.inaturalist.org/taxon_changes/24850 which elevated Circus cyaneus hudsonius to Circus hudsonius
Is there a reason why the observations haven't successfully moved from Circus cyaneus (5170) to Circus cyaneus (559064) + Circus hudsonius (558446)? This should happen automatically if atlases were made

發佈由 loarie 大約 7 年 前

I'm not entirely sure. Could it have something to do with a related taxon swap being deleted? (see https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/2318737 for explanation.)

發佈由 maxkirsch 大約 7 年 前

Wait, never mind - now it looks like observations have been swapped (I guess it was just a little delay)

發佈由 maxkirsch 大約 7 年 前

I found a bug with this observation:
https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/245917
The observer's ID was swapped to the new Circus hudsonius, but the community ID still shows up as Circus cyaneus 5170 (with 100% disagreement).

發佈由 maxkirsch 大約 7 年 前

I think there was just a lag in moving the observations over - looks good now

發佈由 loarie 大約 7 年 前
發佈由 loarie 大約 7 年 前

Figured it would be better to put the explanation for the period earlier today when harriers in North America were labeled Hen Harrier here:
After loarie swapped Circus cyaneus hudsonius (236973) into C. hudsonius (558446), kokhuitan committed a taxon swap of C. c. cyaneus (509495) into the old C. cyaneus (5170) and changed its name to Hen Harrier (rather than swapping the subspecies into a new C. cyaneus); I left a comment on that swap explaining that, for future reference, when a species is split, a new taxon should be created for each post-split species on iNat (rather than swapping the old nominate subspecies into the old, broader species), after which someone (presumably kokhuitan) deleted that split (the missing Taxonomic Swap 24855; in my opinion, that was a bad idea, given that it obscures the history of the taxon on iNat - better to have a record of the occurrence of an incorrect taxon change than to have no record at all). I then committed a split of the old C. cyaneus into the new C. cyaneus and C. hudsonius.

發佈由 maxkirsch 大約 7 年 前

新增評論

登入註冊 添加評論