Vireo 的鑑定。
當我們無法自動指派一筆鑑定到輸出分類群之中時會發生這樣的情況。
檢閱Vireo olivaceus17366的鑑定
Taxonomic Split 57606
(提交於 2020-01-17)
|
|
分拆至 |
|
評論
My understanding is that when taxa are split, it is better to create two new taxa. The new olivaceus sensu strictu is a different taxon concept to the old broader taxon, with a different range and different component subspecies.
@rjq this is another situation (similar to https://www.inaturalist.org/taxon_changes/45743) where Vireo olivaceus migrates pretty much down to the southern limit of Vireo chivi. Do we need a retroactive split to deal with identifications of Vireo olivaceus 17366 that should now be considered Vireo chivi or can this be sorted out in the IDing process - doesn't look like there's too many observations of Vireo olivaceus 17366 in the overalp area
I think this needs the split, there are 146 South American obs of olivaceus which will need confirming (or leaving as the genus). In general, observers seem more willing to make changes when a split has been made, than when a new ID is made with a comment about a split
ok committed
Why are we developing a new taxon for Vireo olivaceus?