https://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:300094-1 https://www.gbif.org/species/2729452
關聯:未知
關聯:代替
All this because the author honoured two different Hartmans, the father and the son? Why doesn't have the original name a priority anyway?
@vladimir_fuka we are aligning with the name accepted by POWO. If you wish to ask as to why POWO has made this decision, feel free to reach out to them at bi@kew.org.
關於
幫助
徵才
社群指南
使用條款
隱私
All this because the author honoured two different Hartmans, the father and the son? Why doesn't have the original name a priority anyway?