Burma Rd Butterfly Walk

2019年05月07日 14:30 - 2019年05月07日 16:48
| 緯度:42.227 | 經度:-71.131 | 半徑(m): 1070 | 行程距離:3 m | 持續時間:138 分 | 觀察者數目:1 |

Walked Burma Rd through Fowl Meadow looking for butterflies, hoping for Compton's Tortoiseshell (didn't find it). Also noted many birds, and a few reptiles and other insects.

Note that I basically went in a straight line for a mile and a half, then back. Of course, this tool maps circles...

由使用者 maractwin maractwin2019年05月09日 14:01 所貼文

Target List

觀察

照片/聲音

觀察者

maractwin

日期

5月 7, 2019 12:24 EDT

照片/聲音

觀察者

maractwin

日期

5月 7, 2019 12:38 EDT

照片/聲音

什麼

紅翅黑鸝 (Agelaius phoeniceus)

觀察者

maractwin

日期

5月 7, 2019 12:30 EDT

照片/聲音

什麼

北美臭菘 (Symplocarpus foetidus)

觀察者

maractwin

日期

5月 7, 2019 11:47 EDT

照片/聲音

什麼

琉灰蝶屬 ( Celastrina)

觀察者

maractwin

日期

5月 7, 2019 12:06 EDT

照片/聲音

觀察者

maractwin

日期

5月 7, 2019 12:02 EDT

照片/聲音

什麼

橙尾鴝鶯 (Setophaga ruticilla)

觀察者

maractwin

日期

5月 7, 2019 11:54 EDT

照片/聲音

什麼

優紅蛺蝶 (Vanessa atalanta)

觀察者

maractwin

日期

5月 7, 2019 11:48 EDT

照片/聲音

觀察者

maractwin

日期

5月 7, 2019 11:30 EDT

照片/聲音

什麼

棕脇鵖鵐 (Pipilo erythrophthalmus)

觀察者

maractwin

日期

5月 7, 2019 11:33 EDT

照片/聲音

什麼

旅鶇 (Turdus migratorius)

觀察者

maractwin

日期

5月 7, 2019 11:46 EDT

照片/聲音

什麼

冠藍鴉 (Cyanocitta cristata)

觀察者

maractwin

日期

5月 7, 2019 11:32 EDT

照片/聲音

什麼

菜粉蝶 (Pieris rapae)

觀察者

maractwin

日期

5月 7, 2019 11:23 EDT

照片/聲音

什麼

琉灰蝶屬 ( Celastrina)

觀察者

maractwin

日期

5月 7, 2019 11:24 EDT

照片/聲音

觀察者

maractwin

日期

5月 7, 2019 11:17 EDT

照片/聲音

觀察者

maractwin

日期

5月 7, 2019 11:15 EDT

照片/聲音

什麼

琉灰蝶屬 ( Celastrina)

觀察者

maractwin

日期

5月 7, 2019 11:22 EDT

照片/聲音

觀察者

maractwin

日期

5月 7, 2019 11:13 EDT

照片/聲音

觀察者

maractwin

日期

5月 7, 2019 11:13 EDT

照片/聲音

什麼

灰藍蚋鶯 (Polioptila caerulea)

觀察者

maractwin

日期

5月 7, 2019 11:07 EDT

照片/聲音

什麼

北美紅雀 (Cardinalis cardinalis)

觀察者

maractwin

日期

5月 7, 2019 11:02 EDT

照片/聲音

觀察者

maractwin

日期

5月 7, 2019 10:58 EDT

照片/聲音

什麼

北美黃林鶯 (Setophaga petechia)

觀察者

maractwin

日期

5月 7, 2019 10:45 EDT

照片/聲音

什麼

錦龜 (油彩龜) (Chrysemys picta)

觀察者

maractwin

日期

5月 7, 2019 10:58 EDT

照片/聲音

什麼

灰貓嘲鶇 (Dumetella carolinensis)

觀察者

maractwin

日期

5月 7, 2019 10:37 EDT

照片/聲音

觀察者

maractwin

日期

5月 7, 2019 10:37 EDT

照片/聲音

觀察者

maractwin

日期

5月 7, 2019 10:34 EDT

照片/聲音

沒有照片和聲音

觀察者

maractwin

日期

5月 7, 2019 12:15 EDT

描述

Circled us on the trail, but wouldn't put down for a photo.

評論

Just trying the trip functionality here. I did see a couple of butterflies that I didn't get photos of, so they aren't represented. I see several shortcomings with how this works, but it is a start.

發佈由 maractwin 約 5 年 前

curious to hear your thoughts maractwin. Yes adding coarse taxa like 'Papilionoidea' to your target list when you aren't sure you can give a robust yes/no (ie post observations or not) for each species can lead to bad interpretation of the data. For example, say you saw a swallowtail fly by that could have been an Eastern Tiger Swallowtail but aren't sure. This trip (and the lack of an obs of Eastern Tiger Swallowtail) is being recorded as an absence for that species:
https://www.inaturalist.org/trips/tabulate?utf8=%E2%9C%93&filters%5Btaxon_name%5D=Eastern+Tiger+Swallowtail&filters%5Btaxon_id%5D=60551&filters%5Bplace_id%5D=&filters%5Bmonth%5D=&filters%5Byear%5D=&filters%5Buser_id%5D=10787
Not sure how to make that clearer to users, but might be worth only allowing species on the target list if its just too confusing to allow coarser taxa.

發佈由 loarie 約 5 年 前

Is it supposed to be a part of your Journal? In the right upper hand I see a link to your posts.

發佈由 optilete 約 5 年 前

@optilete please see https://www.inaturalist.org/pages/trips How to view a trip -> (1) 'Trips on iNaturalist are extensions of journal posts...'

發佈由 loarie 約 5 年 前

I just typed a long critique of trips, and lost it due to a bug that I've reported before, but don't think anyone has put any effort into fixing. This tab had been open in my browser for 7 hours, so when I tried to add the comment, the session data on the form was expired and the comment not entered. This bug gets me quite regularly, as I keep tabs with interesting observations open on my browser and sometimes take a while to enter a comment.

發佈由 maractwin 約 5 年 前

bummer - I've not encountered that before. Please report to the forum if you want it looked into

發佈由 loarie 約 5 年 前

Here’s my second try at comments on trips, shorter than the first time.

I did enter observations without media for the butterflies I saw but was unable to photograph.

I would rather not have trips be part of journals, as that will probably stop me from making every hike I do be a trip, even though I usually make a comprehensive butterfly list each time I go out (I also do an eBird list for nearly every outing).
It would be nice if you could create a custom shape (i.e. a KML file) for the area covered, rather than always have it be a circle.
I’d love to be able to see a list of the species NOT seen, but to generate a useful one would require iNat knowing which butterflies are currently in flight and in range. Not many ranges are entered, and I don’t think there’s even provision for tracking flight periods.
I’m not worried about choosing a higher level taxon like Papilionoidea for my target, as I’m pretty good at finding most of them that are around during a hike. And I’m not afraid to record something to genus when the exact species wasn’t evident in a fly-by (i.e. Colias sp. when I couldn’t tell Clouded vs. Orange Sulphur). Just have to remember that there is an observation bias—all of the swallowtails are likely to be observed, but not all of the Lycaenids.

發佈由 maractwin 約 5 年 前

新增評論

登入註冊 添加評論