注意:此分割影響到部分或全部的鑑定,也許會被替換成 Eurimyia 的鑑定。 當我們無法自動指派一筆鑑定到輸出分類群之中時會發生這樣的情況。 檢閱Lejops lineatus494202的鑑定

Taxonomic Split 84041 (提交於 2020-10-20)

未知
edanko 於 2020年10月20日 16:17 所新增 | 由 edanko 於 2020年10月20日 所提交
分拆至

評論

In the UK this is Anasimyia lineata...is it not possible to retain that name for UK sightings? It is of no use to people here being given Lejops lineata, let alone Eurimyia, as it will just lead them away from finding further information on the species they have seen. As far as I know there is no intention here currently to change from Anasimyia.

發佈由 ophrys 大約 4 年 前

@ophrys good question.

"The European species of this genus were revised by Claussen & Torp (1980). They consign four European species to the genus, but exclude A.lineata, which, like some other authors, they regard as belonging to a separate genus,Eurimyia. Other authors, including Peck (1988), include A.lineata in Anasimyia. Various authors, e.g. Peck (1988), van der Goot (1981), treat Anasimyia as a subgenus of Helophilus. Some include these species in Lejops." - SPECIES ACCOUNTS OF EUROPEANSYRPHIDAE (DIPTERA), GLASGOW 2011

The updates to iNaturalist are based on the consensus that the previous iNaturalist status quo did not make sense to continue, as European workers and the most recent consensus of North American workers agree to elevate the subgenera. So the question now is whether Eurimyia and Anasimyia are separate genera or lumped together. The iNat curatorial team for North American Syrphidae have been using Skevington etal 2018, the guide to Northeastern North American Syrphidae, as a standard reference, and they separate Eurimyia from Anasimyia.

I don't think iNaturalist has a way to allow multiple scientific synonyms to be used for the same species in different parts of the world.

I will tag some others who may be able to help.

@upupa-epops @johnklymko @nbdragonflyguy

發佈由 edanko 大約 4 年 前

新增評論

登入註冊 添加評論